• Home
  • About Me
  • My Work
  • Contact
  • For What It’s Worth: Random Writing Advice
  • Haiku and Senryu
  • Home
  • About Me
  • My Work
  • Contact
  • For What It’s Worth: Random Writing Advice
  • Haiku and Senryu
 

5. The Tracks of Your Tears

12/29/2018

0 Comments

 
In personal writing—or, for that matter, fiction—a few tears go a very long way. They are not a legitimate shortcut to emotion. If misused, overused, or used too soon, they’re a bobsled to sentimentality. You have to earn your tears.

You often don’t need to mention them at all. (I’m constantly editing them out.) If you’ve successfully conveyed the emotion of a scene—through, say, halting dialogue, body language (hand movements can be key), or the way the light or the knickknacks on a shelf have changed—it can be redundant or over the top to say you were crying. Yes, even if the tears flowed in real life. “But that’s how it happened!” is, ironically, a specious argument in personal writing.

When it is important to introduce tears—and such times do exist—think of indirect ways: You suddenly realized the Kleenex in your hand was damp or matted. Your vision blurred. You felt a cold stream on your cheek. Okay, that one might need work. Just, please, no lump in the throat.
0 Comments

4. Open Your Essay Strong

12/22/2018

0 Comments

 
No one is contractually obligated to read past your first sentence.

Feature writers—journalists who write profiles, trend pieces, nonfiction narratives, and the like—are trained to grab readers right from the start, but essayists (particularly personal essayists) often seem to have the idea that the same imperative doesn’t apply to them, so they take their time, they dip their foot in tentatively.

But why shouldn’t it apply to them? Why assume readers picking up your essay in a doctor’s office, or the New Yorker that arrives in their mailbox, will read to the end simply because it’s an essay (or is in the New Yorker)?

This is not a crass, commercial concern. It’s a literary concern. You want people to keep reading, and they can put your work down at any time. Especially after the first sentence.
0 Comments

3. Call Them by Their Names

12/15/2018

0 Comments

 
Names. Give people names. For personal essays, make them up if you need to, for privacy or protection. But repeated and unwavering references to a key character as, say, “my brother” or “my neighbor” become tedious. 

Don’t refer to your mother solely as “my mother” or “my mom.” What do you call her, in memory or life? Such a difference in intimacy, that simple act of deleting the possessive pronoun and capping the word: Mom, Ma, Mother—whatever you know or knew her as. That’s how she lives in your head. Let her live on the page.

(“She” and “he” serve useful functions, too.)
0 Comments

2. Having Your writer's Back

12/8/2018

0 Comments

 
Today in class when we were talking about sending work out—something I always do in the last workshop—a student asked where I stood on following up on a submission to a magazine or journal.

I was a little stunned, because while my regular spiel includes a reminder to keep track of where and when you send essays (Submittable makes this super-easy now) and to follow up, I’d never been asked—before I’d even gotten it—about the advisability of doing so. The way she worded the question implied there might be times when it wasn’t a good idea to check on the status of writing you’ve shed blood for and taken the leap of faith to see into a world of strangers.

So yes, if you haven’t gotten a reply after the publication’s stated response time (assuming such exists), you should without question or apology follow up. Things get lost in transit all the time. They get buried in in-boxes, physical and electronic. Editorial processes are slow and complicated in ways outsiders can’t imagine.

But here’s what surprised me: I then heard coming out of my mouth words I’d never heard myself speak before. I said, “Just like your kids or your partner, you should have your writing’s back.

It deserves it. 

0 Comments

1. "Quote Unquote"

12/1/2018

0 Comments

 
Ending an essay or article with a quote can strike a powerful note, but it’s so much more effective to close on the speaker’s words than the attribution. (Same goes for the end of a section.) I’m struck by how often writers—especially journalists—seem content to send readers on their way with “. . . he says” or “. . . she says.”

It usually takes just a minor restructuring to conclude with the quote, and I can’t remember a single person complaining when I’ve edited a story this way. (I do it a lot.)

“And that,” he said, “is the truth.”

Categories

All
Originality
Voice

Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018

0 Comments

    Categories

    All
    Action
    Asking Questions
    Attributions
    Authority
    Beginnings
    Catching Errors
    Chronology
    Cliches
    Community
    Constructive Criticism
    Contractions
    Creativity
    Crying
    Daily Writing
    Discovery
    Drafts
    Dreams
    Easy Solutions
    Editing
    Editors
    Endings
    Epigraphs
    Essays
    Every Day
    Every Week
    Expletives
    Feedback
    Followup
    Grammar
    Honesty
    Image
    Italics
    Memoir
    Names
    Originality
    Paragraphs
    Perspective
    Prompts
    Query Letters
    Quotes
    Reading Aloud
    Recreating
    Reflection
    Reimagining
    Repetition
    Self-editing
    Sensitive Subjects
    Sentences
    Sentimentality
    Shortform
    Specifics
    Submitting
    Support
    Tears
    Tightening
    Time References
    Titles
    Universality
    Vocabulary
    Voice
    Word Count
    Word Variety
    Writing Goals
    Writing Life
    Writing Practice
    Writing Space
    Writing Topics

    Archives

    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.